New Single – Sk4li – Out Now

After a dry spell of over five years, I’ve only gone and released a drum and bass single!

It’s called “Sk4li” and it’s available now for download on iTunes and Amazon.




Coming soon: Deezer, Beats, Rdio, Google Play & more.

The awesome cover art and inspiration for the tune come from a Brighton artist, also called “Sk4li”. You can find her on Instagram here: @Sk4li


10 Years of This Crap

I actually missed the official anniversary by a couple of months but this blog — believe it or not — has been up and running for ten whole years. In that time it’s gone through several designs, multiple hosts, and patches of good and bad. I’d say right now it’s in a bit of a slump. Don’t take my word for it, take a look at the “recent” content. It’s not very good or very recent. 

Like the blog, I too have undergone various forms of metamorphosis. In ten years I have been married and divorced, changed career several times and suffered some serious bouts of mental illness.

Technology has changed rather a lot too. Right now, I am writing this on my phone. When I first started this blog, the smartphone was a mere twinkle in Ericsson’s (now Sony Ericsson) eye. Back then, a text message was considered futuristic. There was no Twitter and even the mighty Facebook was only just beginning to gain traction.

Ten years is a long time. Where did it go?


Promoted Tweets Annoy Me

I’ve been wrestling with the subject of promoted tweets for a while and I think I’ve come up with a solution. A solution that makes me feel better, at least.


Promoted Tweets Aren’t That Bad

They really aren’t. Actually, they’re a good thing and I fully support them. Provided they are relevant to me, that is. Unfortunately this is rarely the case, as you will see if you read on.

Blame Those I Follow

What I’m finding is that a lot of the promoted tweets I see in my feed are not relevant to me. The reason for this is quite simple. If a brand promotes a tweet, one of the targeting criteria is to promote to those who follow the brand’s followers. This seems fundamentally broken to me. It’s as if Twitter assumes I have the same interests as the people I follow. I don’t. It’s as simple as that.

So because of this, my first solution was born. If I saw an irrelevant promoted tweet, I would unfollow the person whom I am following, that is following the brand doing the promoting. I soon realised that if I kept this up, I would end up following no one. So I stopped doing that.

The Winning Solution

Some time later, promoted tweets are still pissing me off. And I realise that there’s nothing I can do to fix Twitter’s broken targeting. My current solution is much more focused on the brand. Now, whenever I see an irrelevant promoted tweet, I block the brand doing the promoting. I’ll never see that brand in my feed again. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

My only concern is that I will now probably be on the receiving end of lower bidding (and probably lower quality) promoted tweets.

Oh well, I guess I’ll just have to nuke them too…

Music for the Masses

For years I’ve been planning a music career comeback. For years it’s not happened. I’m probably not about to change that either but if you think I’m going to pass up the opportunity to shout about or distribute what I’ve already done to a wider audience, you think like a fool. That’s exactly what I’m doing here.

A couple of years ago I wrote a piece of music to celebrate my return to music called “Yes I’m back”. And I was. Although only for the duration of that one song. I didn’t even put that much effort into distributing it at the time. Foolish really, because it’s not bad.

Kind of picking up where I left off, I’ve finally decided to distribute that song on iTunes, Spotify and Google Play. You can also give it a listen on YouTube if you wish:

You like that, do you? Good. You can get it here:

Music by Lee Stacey on iTunes
Music by Lee Stacey on Spotify
Music by Lee Stacey on Google Play

As for my long term goal of returning to music… there’s not really been any development on that front. Although I may have a change of heart if my iTunes sales go through the roof. Well, I can dream.

I will be releasing other back catalogue stuff on those platforms too, so keep ’em peeled. I may even throw out a few previously unpublished treats too. We’ll see.

Please enjoy the music and pay for it if you think it’s worth it. Or don’t if you don’t. I’m fine with either.


Why we are still texting?

This article is in response to Joshua Fruhlinger’s post on Engadget “This is the Modem World: Why Are We Still Texting?

Joshua’s article explains how silly it is that we’re still using outdated, expensive SMS messages in a world where we’re all carrying devices capable of so much more.

mobile phone keypad sms

In my response, I shall state what I believe the reasons are.

1. Not everyone has a smartphone

My Mum doesn’t have one, neither does my Dad. They are a minority these days but there are still thousands of people who just use dumbphones. SMS treats everyone equally, regardless of device.

2. SMS gives good UX

Whatever your choice of phone, SMS works in pretty much the same way. It’s not capable of doing anything but text (MMS is a different topic) so for that reason, it’s simple.

3. Messaging apps are crap

Not all apps are available for all mobile platforms. If your friend doesn’t have a Blackberry you can’t send them a BBM from your Blackberry. WhatsApp doesn’t work the same way across platforms and due to being independent, probably won’t exist in 5 years time. Not only this but how do you know which app everyone will be using in 6 months? “Kik me” What?

4. Email is horrible

Email is fairly standard but it’s horrible to use. For starters, you have to set it all up yourself. It just doesn’t come as easily as text messaging because it does so much more.

Let’s face it, SMS just works and there’s nothing better at this time. With manufacturers and service vendors playing their cards so close to their chest, there’s not likely to be any time soon.

Fred MacMurray in Double Indemnity

Movie Review – Double Indemnity

How good can a film about insurance be? These days, a movie plot based around knocking someone off to get your hands on the insurance money is a concept done to death. Back in 1944 that wasn’t quite the case but even then, it wasn’t exactly a new concept. Naturally, I’m wondering if such a thing can fly at all almost 70 years later. That’s almost twice as long as I’ve been alive!

movie poster - Double Indemnity 1944Fast talking insurance salesman, Walter Neff (Fred MacMurray) is good at his job and he knows it. He knows the business inside out. He even seems to think he knows how to commit the perfect murder. Oddly, the movie begins with Walter limping into his office, clearly in some discomfort, in the early hours. He sits down to record a memo to his colleague, confessing to his so-called perfect murder. He tells us how he didn’t get the money or the girl. At that point I was wondering why I should bother watching the rest. I know he did it and I know he failed.

Okay, so now I’m curious. How does a man end up in that situation? Perhaps the murder wasn’t so perfect after all. Maybe it was and something else went wrong. I guess we have to leave it to Walter and his beautifully written narrative.

Back to the girl and the money… The girl is Phyllis Dietrichson (Barbara Stanwyck), the wife of a businessman who is simply known as Mr. Dietrichson. She wants him dead and would like to profit from it. At first Walter doesn’t take the bait but the combination of his cockiness and her allure get the better of him.

The events that lead to the confession are not as cut and dried as you might think. There are several twists and turns in what ends up being a very clever plot, laced with exceptional dialogue. After being on the edge of my seat for 2 hours, this one’s getting a 4 out of 5 from me.

Double Indemnity on IMDB

Year: 1944

Director: Billy Wilder

Writers: Billy Wilder, Raymond Chandler, Charles M. Cain

My Rating: 4/5

Why am I doing movie reviews?

A journalistic mission of movie reviews

I have decided to set myself a mission to review every single movie in the Guardian’s “Greatest Movies of All Time” list.

I’ve started with Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. More… Many more will follow. I hope.

Why am I doing this?

Seeing as you asked, I’m doing it for my own personal gratification. I’ve seen a lot of movies. A lot of great movies. I’ve also seen a lot of not-so-good movies. At one point in my life I was watching 1-2 movies every single day. The problem with watching so many movies is that you forget them, at least I do. I often find that several movies will blur into one memory.

To fix my memory problems and make the good ones really stand out, I’m going to review as many of them as I can. Even movies that I have seen before, whether I liked them or not, I will watch again and review.

No, I probably won’t get through the whole list and I will probably throw a few other movies into the mix myself.

It’ll be fun, hopefully. If that stops being the case, I’ll stop doing it.

As much as I love you, my dear reader, this is for me.

I’m happy to share it with you though and I have absolutely no objection to you doing the same!

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind - alternate movie poster

Movie Review – Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Having never been a fan of romantic movies – just not wired up that way – I approached this film with caution and a completely open mind. Seeing Jim Carrey playing the lead I was the back foot so I wiped my mind of all things Ace Ventura or Mask Related. I hadn’t read the blurb or previously shown any interest in the movie due to my massive prejudice of the genre so I just dived in and watched with as few preconceptions as possible. Somebody stop me! Sorry.

Movie poster: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless MindAs soon as the movie starts and we wake up with the main character Joel (Jim Carrey) we feel a kind of empathy with his sucky rat-race life, as he heads off to work. Just another boring da… wait, this is romance, obviously something extraordinary will happen. Predictably, something does happen at this point and the romantic journey begins with a rare act of impulse.

As you would expect, he meets a girl. That girl is a neurotic, impulsive and somewhat superficial character called Clementine, played by Kate Winslet. Their meeting has a kind of awkward cuteness and an air of something not quite being right. Trust me, when it clicks as to why, it clicks hard.

Enter the conflict. Not surprisingly, the character traits you pick up on from both characters cause them to drive each other apart. At this stage of the movie, I’m thinking it’s all a bit standard, save for some nice Michael Chapman style photography in the opening titles which seem to come in quite late in the game.

It all starts to get a bit strange when a memory wiping procedure enters into the plot. When I say strange, I’m talking David Lynch strange. Initially I thought the movie might be a mobius strip like Lynch’s Mulholland Drive. Some of the visual effetcs and concepts that are introduced frome hereon in are more in-line with sci-fi than romance. It’s at this point that you have to pay attention because conflict gets added to conflict and a whole new romantic sub-plot (or maybe more) gets introduced. Did you wonder why someone as high profile as Kirsten Dunst was playing a mere secretary? It turns out that she’s more important to the plot than you might at first think.

What you’re wondering now is whether there’s a happy ending or not. It’s a romance so there must be a happy ending, right?

I’m not going to spoil it for you if you haven’t seen it yet because I strongly recommend that you do. It gets a 4/5 rating from me. Surprisingly enjoyable, not too mushy and slightly warped in places. Great stuff, however you’re wired up.

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind on IMDB

Year: 2004

Director: Michel Gondry

Writers: Charlie Kaufman, Michel Gondry, Pierre Bismuth

My Rating: 4/5

Why am I doing movie reviews?